Tag Archives: council

City Council Meetings Jan 15, 2018

The first city council meeting day of 2018 was a busy one indeed. They had the Committee Of The Whole in the morning, a Budget Overview public meeting in the afternoon, in-camera meetings, and the regular meeting in the evening.

The gallery was overflowing into the hall for the Committee Of The Whole at 9AM. The major draw was, of course, the discussion surrounding a motion, by Councilor Ross,  to extend the exit deadline imposed on Whispers Of Hope.

The non-perfunctory topics of this meeting were: (links take you to YouTube)

Live Stream

This meeting also saw a return to Live Streaming. This first day back live wasn’t without troubles. The audio was initially slightly garbled but improved quite a bit. Until it got bad again and then worse and then I checked and found that the batteries powering the device (zoom H2) I was using to pick up the sound had run out of power. This was fixed with a quick AC/DC converter purchase. But then when the equipment was reconnected before the evening meeting the software couldn’t see the camera it had been using all morning and afternoon. By the time a replacement was attached and device drivers updated it was 7 or 8 minutes into the meeting.

Even with these problems the topic drew viewers. Hundreds of views happened and at one time there were 50 simultaneous watchers. With this being an election year we hope to live cast every meeting in addition to making them view-able here on the web and on Shaw Cable TV. (the live webcasts of these meetings ended up on my personal youtube channel instead of the gftvca channel – to those who subscribed during the stream thinking you might see more of the same in the future I invite you to subscribe to the correct channel, the one the links above on this page point at)

Evening (Regular) Meeting

The actual decision on what to do with Whispers Of Hope wasn’t made until the evening meeting. By the time they got around to discussing it their fatigue was showing.

For those not into the pie chart, these were the non perfunctory topics of the meeting:


The meetings in their entirety (the second one is the Budget Process overview – no pie for that one)

And for those interested the live streams appear below

Committee of the Whole comes in two parts

Funding request for coordination and implementation of Kettle River Watershed Mgmt. Plan Request to rescind the six month eviction notice for 7212 Riverside Drive Whispers of Hope Motions to vary the agenda of the evening meeting Vienna Woods - Granby Wilderness REGIONAL TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION - WITH AREA D Monthly Highlight Reports from Department Managers REPORTS, QUESTIONS AND INQUIRIES FROM MEMBERS OF COUNCIL 2017 Capital Project Carryover and Scope Change Outside Works Grand Forks RCMP Detachment Mayors Report - Quarterly Crime Statistics City of West Kelowna - Request for local governments to share in Cannabis Tax Revenue Grand Forks International Baseball Tournament Society - Special Occasion Liquor Licence Bylaw 1682 Exception - Recreational and Off Highway Vehicles Bylaw 1958-A3 - to amend Fees and Charges Bylaw No. 1958 Notice of motion by Councilor Ross regarding Whispers Of Hope BC Transit Discussion Questions From Public and Media

Building a Safe and Secure Grand Forks

There was a public meeting at Perley School Dec 14, 2017 at 6PM. As the poster shows it was titled “Building a Safe and Secure Grand Forks”.

Essentially the meeting was about the homeless and the problems that both they and the residents of the city face. Within the ranks of the homeless are people affected by mental health issues, substance abuse addictions, and poverty. And a small group of criminals engaged in property crime: trespass and theft.

The topic has fueled much rancorous discussion in both council chambers, the coffee shops of the town and online social networking.

The meeting was facilitated by 3 city councilors: Butler, Ross and Tripp (though most of council was present). A panel of speakers from various agencies involved in this spoke and answered questions. Representatives from Mental Health, the RCMP, Block Watch, and Citizens On Patrol faced a crowd of over 100 residents in a session that lasted 2 hours. People associated with Whispers of Hope and Boundary Emergency Temporary Housing and Shelter were also present in the audience.

City Council Meeting Sept 18, 2017

City Council held one regular meeting on Sept 18, 2017

It was a short meeting and nothing controversial or intense happened.

A short note on the pie chart: there are more items in the agenda than slice that appear in the pie. This is because anything that takes less than 90 seconds doesn’t become a slice in the pie. The ‘missing things’ are in the meeting – they’re just between the things that took long enough to become pie slices.
IF you choose to view the meeting on YouTube you will find a list of links, to every item in the meeting, in the read more description of the video.



Council Reports RDKB REPORT Rotary Club - directional signage Boundary Museum 2018 Fee for Service request Grand Forks Art Gallery Society - 2018 Fee for Service request Bylaw 1606-A6 to rezone 7357-10th St. from R-1 to R-3A Questions From Public and Media

City Council Meetings Sept 5, 2017

Council had two meetings on Tuesday, Sept 5, 2017.

In the Committee Of The Whole there were 3 delegations: Community Futures, The Phoenix Foundation and Grand Forks Search and Rescue. Look for the presentations. If yor\re unsure on what these organix=zations do then these shows

Council also considered new rules pointed at shelters being set up in parks or on public property. Pretty much targeting the homeless the rule says no temporary shelters allowed between 9AM and 7PM. Which sounds okay on first listen but if you give it a moment and think about who this rule is intended for then a few questions crop up like:

  • How would someone without a time keeping device know when it’s 9AM (or 7PM)? They are homeless and not as slaved to the clock as the rest of us.
  • If they miss that 9AM deadline and the city takes their shelter and stuff away then where can they pick it up? Because if that’s not already the case then some lawyer at some point will likely argue that the moment the city agents take possession of somebody’s worldly possessions the city has to hold onto them for a period of time. (and they’ll likely do it pro bono but the city’s our lawyers’ time in court fighting this would be paid by the us, the taxpayers) Has the city worked that part out?
    Hint: It might be more cost effective to just assume the city would be forced to hang onto the stuff and do that from the get go instead of incurring the 4 or 5 figure legal costs of learning it the hard way in court. (and the city would look nearly so heartless as it would if the stuff is trashed) If anybody on staff is reading this then look into that maybe and save us some money, eh?
  • I don’t know if this would be a big deal or not but: How would the city know the person that shows up to claim the stuff is the owner?
  • And if the person in question is a repeat offender then how will they be dealt with? They have no income so fines won’t be paid . . . the exercise will be fruitless. Not cost free though – anyone acting on behalf of the city or processing the file would be paid by us taxpayers.

In the Regular meeting (evening) the big issues of the night were:

  • whether the city would support the Fall Fair financially or not (look for that in the late item)
  • a dispute with a property owner / water customer over payment on the installation of a pit meter.
    This took up the largest part of the meeting with the discussion during the Information Items part of the meeting and later on the question period. Both times Councilor Butler recused herself from the discussion.
    In the agenda this item refers to two people twice and thereafter one of them exclusively. That one was present in the room and hoped to take part in the discussion council was having but the rules governing the regular meeting say a unanimous vote of council is required to allow that. Staff was asked what names appeared on the property title and when the answer came back that the person present was not named on the title they voted against allowing the visitor to speak. So they had to wait until question period.
    The decision did not go in the customer’s favour and neither did the discussion during question period. It got a bit heated.
  • The Permissive Tax Exemptions list of places and organizations applying for and being granted tax exemption. Interestingly the non-profit organizations include financials with their applications so if you’re curious to know how much money they have and how they spend / disburse it then that part of the agenda document would be interesting reading. Use the button above to fetch it from the city’s website.

The Committee Of The Whole

The Regular Meeting


Community Futures Phoenix Foundation of the Boundary Communities Grand Forks Search and Rescue Volunteer Appreciation Night 2017 and Policy #204 Update Monthly Highlight Reports from Department Managers Bylaw 1959-A1 Parks Access Bylaw Amendment Bylaw 1606-A6 Zoning Bylaw Amendment Grand Forks and District Fall Fair Minutes RDKB REPORT MIA Appointments of City Voting Delegates Scott Davis and Elizabeth Eastwood - Outstanding Charges Questions From Public and Media